Frankly, My Dear, Search This Blog

Monday, October 31, 2011

Happy Halloween! ♥

Hello readers,

I'm having a great day. I discovered that I got one of the leads in the school play, and it also happens to be Halloween, which is one of my favorite holidays! 


Though now I'd probably have to list Christmas as my favorite holiday, when I was a little kid Halloween was my favorite. Trick or treating always seemed so exciting - though, to be fair, it was never the candy I cared about. Yes, I love candy (I'm a confessed chocoholic), but for me it was more fun to dress up and just that I had the opportunity to run around the neighborhood at night, in the cool Autumn air, thrilled me.


I still love Halloween, only now that I'm older and not trick or treating, you kind of grow out of the fun of it. But I still love the spookiness, the crisp Autumn air (all the snow has melted, but it's still nice and chilly outside), snatching candy and seeing all of the neighborhood dressed up in costumes and decorations (though let's be fair: my neighborhood is a little on the dull side. A pumpkin and maybe a wreath of glittery leaves is enough to cause excitement).


Anyway, in honor of Halloween I did a review for one of those classic, cheesy, but still fun horror flicks for yesterday's SMR (you can read it here) and today here's my attempt at scrapping up some Halloween/classic movie related stuff.


A lot of these photos have been circulating around the blogosphere lately for Halloween; nothing really original but it's hard to find Halloween/classic movie stuff so I gave it my best! :) 




Lucy! <3

Joan Crawford




Judy Garland

Pier Angeli for Halloween.
Happy Halloween! x

Pier Angeli


Debbie Reynolds (sorry for the blurriness!)




Carole Lombard, Clark Gable and company [they're dressed up, so I guess it counts as a Halloween photo..]



Carole and Vivien with black (well, blackish for Vivien..) cats.

And, one of the most awesome Halloween stories ever about Lucy, told by her daughter, Lucie Arnaz --


HAVE A HAPPY HALLOWEEN!! ♥

Sunday, October 30, 2011

Sunday Movie Review: "House on Haunted Hill" (1959)

You might have noticed a few changes in my tab bars. I have made separate pages for my favorite actors and actresses, as well as expanded the lists of both quite a bit. You can now head on over to my favorite actresses page and read about My Fifteen Favorite Actresses (you'll notice some surprising additions - but we'll talk about that later this week :D), and over to the actors page to read about My Ten Favorite Actors (though this may become fifteen, we'll see.)

I watched a bunch of movies this weekend, making up for not getting to watch any last weekend. But, my dear followers, with tomorrow being Halloween I thought it only appropriate to watch an old horror film and review it for today, and therefore, that's what I have for you. On to the review!

***


The poster: Nothing amazing, but it looks like the cover of a children's mystery novel, which endears me to it :)

The plot:
Millionaire Frederick Loren offers five people $10,000 to stay a night in a remote haunted house, giving each of them a loaded gun as a "party favor." Throughout the night, they're terrorized by skeletons, disembodied heads and other grisly apparitions. Will any of the guests survive to win the prize? Or will the house scare them to death? The legendary Vincent Price stars in one of director William Castle's most famous chillers. [from Netflix]

The starring players:
[you probably wouldn't recognize most of them..]
  • Vincent Price as Frederick Loren
  • Carol Ohmart as Annabelle Loren
  • Richard Long as Lance Schroeder (Barbara Stanwyck's son from The Big Valley)
  • Carolyn Craig as Nora Manning
  • Alan Marshal as Dr. David Trent
  • Elisha Cook Jr. as Watson Pritchard 
The verdict:
2/5
**
So like I said up there, I didn't really recognize anyone but Vincent Price (my father informed me that "Lance" also played Stany's son on "The Big Valley"). Most of them are B movie actors or minor TV characters, not exactly a star studded ensemble cast.

Of course, going into this I didn't really expect it to be a good movie. These old horror films tend to be (by stereotype) bad, though there are definitely exceptions to the rule. But I am not a horror film junkie and so I wasn't really expecting to love this.

Well, yes... I didn't. There is certainly not much harem scaram here, though I actually believe the plot has potential (albeit plenty of cliches but still potential), it couldn't be excetued properly, not in this B film budget. I'm not going to be too harsh with this film because just going into it I was expecting the cheesy twists and tricks, the laughable "scary" effects and the holes of the plot.

That is exactly what I got. This film will ensure a lot of screaming from a particular female character, really awful rubber "scary" masks and plastic skeletons, and so many obvious holes in the plot. It was actually really funny and I was doubling over with laughter at points; this is a hyperbola of a dated old horror film.

Terrible pacing and the characters are not utilized to their best. There are five who have come to spend the night for the money - the "pretty young girl" is overused, the doctor gets his moment in the end, the old caretaker is a creepy enough to make his mark, Lance has a habit of getting locked in dark rooms, but then there's the last, older woman who is completely forgotten about (trust me, this annoyed me SO much) save for blood dripping from the ceiling onto her hands.

There isn't much more to say - the acting is stereotypical, falling to point, just pretty much everything you would really expect of this movie. Campy, funny, and far from scary but hey, it's only an hour fourteen minutes. If you like horror films or just want to give one a try, I would actually suggest this because it's certainly entertaining. Not exactly "so bad it's good", but "bad but it's not a total waste". Have fun picking out the holes in the plot (match them up with what IMdb found!) and laughing at the cheesy effects. I HATE to call old movies dated because you know, they are not, not always - but this one, well... even I must admit. . :)

In a strange way, there is something endearing about these movies (there are plenty of these short, campy fares with Vincent Price) - I can't exactly place my finger on it, but there is! Anyway, if you want to watch something exactly good avoid this and go watch "Sunset Boulevard" or "Whatever Happened to Baby Jane?" instead - yeah, not horror, but awesome and dark and suspenseful. :)

The bottom line:
Go into this knowing what you're going to get before hand: campy, cheesy, and not scary. If you still want to watch it, do so by all means because it's short enough (an hour fourteen minutes) to not be a waste of your time and you'll have fun laughing at the corniness. But like I said, if you want to watch something good pick something else. (Go watch "Rosemary's Baby"). 

Some photos:




Some trivia:

  • This film actually attracted many audiences, and the large grosses caught the eye of Hitchcock. Hitch decided to make his own "low budget horror film": "Psycho".
  • The Ennis Brown House in Los Angeles, built in 1924 by Frank Lloyd Wright, was used for the exterior shots.
  • The director, William Castle, decided to pull this prank in movie theaters: there is a scene in the film where a (obviously) plastic skeleton rises from an acid pool. When this happened, a plastic skeleton would appear from a black box next to the screen. It would glide down a wire and sweep over the audience's heads in attempts to spook them. A lot of theaters had to stop using this effect though, because local teenage boys would bring slingshots to the cinema and fire stones, balls, and whatever they could find at the skeleton.
A movie tidbit:


[The whole movie is also available for watching here on Youtube if you'd care to watch]

***

That's it for this Sunday! I'll probably do a Halloween post tomorrow but all the while: Happy Halloween! (a little early).

Saturday, October 29, 2011

"Ava Gardner: Love is Nothing" Book Review

Well... guess what?.... it's... SNOWING OUTSIDE! :) You can imagine my happiness from the insane amount of talking I do about the weather here on this blog ("I wore tights today, it's so cold!" "My fingers are freezing as I type!" "The leaves are turning orange and it smells like fall!") - but seriously. Where I live, we don't even get flurries until December (if we're lucky). And yes, though it isn't much more than a sprinkling of snow, snow is snow. <3 Snow before Halloween, where I live; with the trees not even bare yet - well, I could never dream... so... here's to hoping this will be a snowy winter for me. (If we're getting snow in OCTOBER, I'd like to presume...) So happy! :)

Okay, now today I've got a book review for you - "Ava Gardner: Love is Nothing," by Lee Server.


Let me start off by saying that this is a pretty decently sized book. The actual biography comes in at exactly 500 pages, and though it's not a monster, it's on the huge side for sure.
.
That was my one reservation about reading this book - not that I don't like thick reads, but I'm not Ava obsessed or anything and I was wondering if I was really willing to read that many pages about her. Okay, scratch that: it sounds mean, because I do really like Ava Gardner but this is versus, perhaps, five hundred pages about Lucy in which I wouldn't think twice about purchasing (if it's Lucy, the thicker the better).

ANYWAY, my thirst to know more about her and my love of Classic Hollywood won out - so I went ahead and decided to read it. 

My thoughts about this book are kind of all over place, but here's an attempt at trying to review it.

Okay, so for sure I did learn lots of details about Ava's life, personal and professional, through reading this book. Though a lot of it was clarification from what we already know about Ava's "Cinderella story" (if you called her life story that to her face, though, she'd probably throw a drink on you) - she had humble beginnings as a "barefoot farm girl" (and I'll give it to her, she was never ashamed of this, telling Bogie once she was a "little hillbilly girl" at heart or something), but went onto become one of the prettiest starlets in Hollywood who really enjoyed hard drinking and partying.

Ava's life is so tumultuous (especially during her Frank Sinatra period) that this is most certainly a page turner (a better title might have been "Ava Gardner: Never a Dull Moment"). And her story is an exciting one, almost written out like a novel. Reading about her childhood in "Grabtown", North Carolina was particularly interesting. I read that a young Ava hated to wear shoes (a symbol of her playful, footlose and fancy free kind of spirit that would last her through and through) and after school would stick her shoes in her mailbox and run around barefoot years before she even became the Barefoot Contessa.

The author really can write and if you gave him the most dull subject he can make it exciting. You can tell he really adores Ava, but does not put much effort into defending her at her most unlikable moments. He wants you to love Ava but is pretty blunt about the bad things, like Ava throwing tantrums with reporters, having an affair with Robert Taylor (when he was still married to Barbara Stanwyck), drinking too much, etc. His excuse is "she was so beautiful, no one cared."

By the time I reached the middle of the book I didn't hate Ava but I was coming to the conclusion she was some kind of a monster and I was confused. In her start, she seemed so humble and naive and within a couple turn of the pages she turns into this hard drinking party girl who hates Hollywood. I was wondering about the transition and though we know she throws drinks on reporters because she thinks her face is now too old to be taken photos of, how did she come to these stages? Though I don't always encourage biographers to turn into psychologists, sometimes digging deeper to come to conclusions about their subject's behavior (like Suzanne Finstad did for "Natasha", the biography of Natalie Wood) not only defends their subject and makes them more likable, gives closure to the reader.

Lee Server (also author of "Robert Mitchum: Baby, I Don't Care") definitely provides us with a lot of brutal facts that are interesting and gossipy, but verging on tabloid fodder at points because he cannot provide much reason for her behavior except that she was "beautiful." Just from reading the book one can make guesses, but Server should have had that in the actual book and since he does not, it lacks completion. Having studied and researched someone for so long, you would think that he would feel comfortable enough to jump in with his own theories at times. I wouldn't have minded; I think it would have connected a string of dots to make this book an excellent biography.

Because over all, it was good. A blunt portrait of Ava but I was expecting a lot it beforehand, just from what circulates about Ava through the grapevine. There are a lot of good things to be said about Ava, too, and things to sympathize with her over. By the end of the book I still managed to like her. The "old" Ava, once she got over her fear of aging, is lovable. The old Ava seems to return to her humbler roots... she enjoys cartoons and ironing and walking her Corgis around London. And there were remaining, redeeming factors about Ava strung throughout the book: she was far from racist, believed in everyone being equal. She was modest when it came to her acting (though not always about her beauty). She loved animals, especially dogs (Corgis in particular). 

Basically, in the end, Ava comes across as human. The book is thorough without exactly arriving to a point, but it comes out alright in the end because we see Ava as human. Not a monster and not an angel, but human which is the perfect medium and how someone should come across in a biography (unless we're talking about like, Adolf Hitler). There are definitely points through the middle of the book where she is not likable but by the time you're finished, you can sympathize with her and still like her. What I'm trying to say is: though you will have your doubtful moments, this won't tarnish your view of Ava completely.

What I mean is: this will not exactly shatter but at least make cracks in the Golden Hollywood Goddess that defines Ava's image. I cannot exactly imagine Ava being upset about it though. You can tell she was someone who didn't like Hollywood (the exact reasons why are never explained, to my annoyance) and probably didn't care what anyone else thought. She would probably encourage the honesty of this book. When I did my review for Lauren Bacall's autobiography, I said that by reading the book you will love Lauren and have immense respect for her. I don't think that exactly applies to this book, but Ava's memory is not shattered and hardcore fans won't be disturbed. I wasn't surprised, though. If you told me these things about, oh, Audrey Hepburn I might have been - but with all fairness, it was Ava, and I saw it coming. ;)

A lot of solid facts in this book and gossipy tidbits that delve into Old Hollywood for us classic Hollywood fans to enjoy. There's also bits about her relationships with other Classic figures, like Lana Turner, Howard Hawks, and John Houston. What this book lacks is a few paragraphs here and there that would have tried to explain and defend Ava's sometimes wild behavior. "Beauty" and "Hollywood" are not always good excuses. 

I would suggest this book in the end, because it had the potential to be a great biography, but there were things it simply lacked. I will give it a 4/5 - only with slight generosity, because the fact remains that I definitely know a lot more about Ava after reading this book. 

***
Before I leave: a new poll is up! You now have about twelve days to vote and tell me whether you like "Rebel Without a Cause" (1956) or "West Side Story" (1961) better.

That's it for today! Tomorrow I will hopefully have a movie review of a "scary" film for Halloween. :)

I'll leave you with a photo of Ava in a Halloween pinup:


And I'm off to enjoy the snow with a cup of hot chocolate! :)

Wednesday, October 26, 2011

What's My Line? Wednesday || Natalie Wood

I started this series earlier last month, but only today did I realize (in math class...) that I have pretty much negelected it.

So.. it's Wednesday... have yourself some WML? with Natalie Wood trying to fool the panel with a [pretty funny] Russian accent :)


"Are you something other than American?"
"Vell.. in my mind...yes..."

I should have a review for "Ava Gardner: Love is Nothing" by Lee Server sometime this week, by the way. (I finished it last night, and it proved to be.. an interesting read)... and I may have some Halloween themed posts coming up, too, so stay tuned for more interesting blogs. ;) 

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

What's In My Netflix Queue

Being the nutty book lover I am, I often go to the bookstore and buy a bunch of books at once and when I do that it's called "a book haul" -- and you know, once they pile up it's "waiting on my nightstand."

I don't really think you can have a movie haul because you can only watch one movie at a time. But since Netflix is the bread and butter of my movie watching life, I usually keep my queue filled with movies awaiting to be watched. Actually: for a movie buff, my queue is probably pretty small... at the moment, it's currently 29, but that crumples to the 100 and something my dad has in his queue. But the thing is you know I only get to watch movies over the weekend so my queue is always full for me, with me adding a bunch of movies from time to time. (What I'm trying to say is: my queue never runs dry.)

The bottom line is I'm going to tell you what I've got in my queue right now. You'll probably be seeing reviews  for these in the near future but don't be afraid to jump in and tell me what you thought of these (if you've seen them).

I would like to say this is in no particular order, but actually this is in chronological order though I change it frequently depending on my mood. (Like I've got "Psycho" in first place right now for Halloween). So take it anyway you want, really. ;)

  1. Psycho (1960): Janet Leigh, Anthony Perkins, Vera Miles
  2. The Dark Corner (1946): Lucille Ball, Clifton Webb, Mark Stevens... (like the only Lucy movie at Netflix I haven't seen yet).
  3. Jezebel (1938): Bette Davis, Fay Bainter, Jack Norton
  4. The Rainmaker (1956): Burt Lancaster, Katharine Hepburn
  5. A Place In the Sun (1951): Montgomery Clift, Elizabeth Taylor
  6. Dark Victory (1939): Bette Davis, Humphrey Bogart
  7. The Yellow Rolls Royce (1964): Ingrid Bergman, Rex Harrison
  8. Strangers on a Train (1951): Farley Granger, Ruth Roman
  9. Follow the Fleet (1936): Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers (and Lucy and Betty Grable appear as extras, too :D)
  10. City Lights (1931): Charlie Chapman, Virginia Cherrill
  11. With Six You Get Eggroll (1968): Doris Day, Brian Keith
  12. I'll Be Seeing You (1945): Ginger Rogers, William Dieterle
  13. Marjorie Morningstar (1957): Natalie Wood, Gene Kelly (I'm trying to get through the book first.)
  14. The Star (1950): Bette Davis, Sterling Hayden, Natalie Wood
  15. Mr. and Mrs. Smith (1941): Carole Lombard, Robert Montgomery
  16. Deception (1946): Bette Davis, Paul Henried
  17. Mr. Blandings Builds His Dream House (1948): Myrna Loy, Cary Grant
  18. Mrs. Miniver (1942): Greer Garson, Walter Pidgeon
  19. Random Harvest (1942): Greer Garson, Ronald Colman
  20. The Night of the Iguana (1964): Deborah Kerr, Ava Gardner, Richard Burton 
  21. Grand Hotel (1932): Greta Garbo, John Barrymore, Joan Crawford 
  22. Only Angels Have Wings (1939): Cary Grant, Jean Arthur, Rita Hayworth
  23. Titanic (1953): Barbara Stanwyck, Clifton Webb, Robert Wagner
  24. You Can't Take it With You (1938): Jimmy Stewart, Jean Arthur
  25. Made for Each Other (1939): Jimmy Stewart, Carole Lombard
  26. Possessed (1947): Joan Crawford, Van Heflin
  27. A Star is Born (1954): Judy Garland, James Mason
  28. The Killers (1946): Ava Gardner, Burt Lancaster
  29. Raintree Country (1957): Elizabeth Taylor, Montgomery Clift
I think the most common actress in there must be Bette Davis - I have a ton of Bette films! And the ones I'm probably most excited for are:
  • "A Place in the Sun" (as luck would have it, there is a wait... grrr!)
  • "Dark Victory"
  • "Mr. and Mrs. Smith"
  • "Mrs. Miniver"
  • "The Killers"
  • "A Star is Born"
But you know, I'm always pretty much excited to see any classic movie. :)

I hope this post wasn't boring and remember, if you've seen any of these twenty-nine films feel free to jump in with your opinion of it!! 

Since I don't like my posts to be photo-less (I was going to put in movie posters but then I realized this post would just become humongous), I'll leave you with...




Veronica Lake all dressed up for Halloween (you know, to get us in the mood for the holiday). :D

Ciao!