Frankly, My Dear, Search This Blog

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Dueling Divas || Greer vs. Joan ["When Ladies Meet"]

I'm here to write a post for Backlots's "Dueling Divas Blogathon," but first, guys... THANK YOU!!! Over the past two days I have not only reached fifty followers, I've exceeded it. Honestly, you people, I can't thank you enough! Like, every one of you that follow me! I'm sorry if it sounds like I'm overreacting - but I'm thinking back to when no one followed me, and there were no comments, and it was just loneliness, and now I get awesome comments from all of you like everyday, and for me it's really really supportive. <3 So thanks soo  much for following me, I'm really Vivien Leigh cat smiling, and in my appreciation here's a GIF of Greer smiling as large as I am now:

[via]

Thank you so, so, much all of you! And now, onto the blogathon [but THANK YOU AGAIN!]:

***
A quick warning: There may be a few spoilers in this, but I'll give you a great fair warning when they're on the way. Apologizes!

About a month ago, I wrote a review for a 1941 MGM vehicle, "When Ladies Meet," starring Joan Crawford, Robert Taylor, and one of my newest favorite actresses, Greer Garson. In my review I gave this film three out of five stars, and you can check out the review to read more about what I thought of the actual movie. For this blogathon, I'm going to focus on the rivalry between Greer and Joan's characters in this movie - though the irony of it is, at times they don't really act like rivals at all. Here's the plot, supplied by IMdb [with some slight doctoring by yours truly]:

Mary (Joan Crawford), a writer working on a novel about a love triangle, is attracted to her publisher, Rogers (Herbert Marshall). Her suitor Jimmy (Robert Taylor) is determined to break them up; he introduces Mary to the publisher's wife, Claire (Greer Garson), without telling Mary who she is - and the two land up liking each other. 


In this first ring we have --

[via]


Claire Woodruff. [Greer Garson]. Beautiful redheaded wife of book publisher Rogers Woodruff [Herbert Marshall]. Bright personality and a little bit of a social butterfly. An elegant dresser and a fan of color blocking. She is an expert sailor and knows everything there is about boats and the like. She does hurt inside over her husband's numerous, obvious infidelities, but it's hard to tell by her bubbly, bright personality.  


And then over in the other ring, we have --
[I actually made this one, that's why it's so awful. ';)]


Mary Howard. [Joan Crawford]. Sometimes called Minnie by friends. A liberally thinking best selling novelist who is appreciative of new thinking and ideas. [Her latest novel happens to be about a love triangle.] Adored by suitor Jimmy [Robert Taylor] but madly in love with her new publisher, Rogers. He's married - but it doesn't matter... sort of. Interesting dresser and lover of big spectacle glasses that make her eyes look even bigger [if that's possible.]













Now that we've got our characters straight, the plot consists of a love triangle between these two beautiful ladies and Herbert Marshall - with Robert Taylor pulling the strings. His character, Jimmy, meets Claire at a party the same night Mary and Rogers are having a romantic dinner at home. He decides to have Claire and Mary meet, hence the title of this film, in hopes of breaking up Mary and Rogers's relationship. However, when he introduces the two to each other, he tricks Claire into pretending to be someone else, and therefore Mary doesn't know that the girl she is so quickly becoming friends with is actually her lover's wife. (After all, she was probably expecting  a frump, not Greer Garson.)

Okay, I'm going to give away the ending of the film here just because I think it needs to be included, but if you'd like you can just skip onto the next paragraph and onto the duel! In the end of the film, everything comes clean. Claire and Mary figure out who each other really are, and Rogers breaks it to Mary that he was never planning on leaving Claire for her. Claire and Mary manage to make amends, for they have respect for each other (after a very deep conversation between the two of them), and Claire leaves by herself (with Rogers chasing after her a little later.) Mary and Jimmy are left alone and the movie ends with the two of them in each other's arms. Predictable for the 40's, the married couple gets back together (most likely), proving adultery wrong - it all coincides with the Hays Code.

The irony of this rivalry is that when Claire and Mary actually meet each other, it isn't even a rivalry at all. Though before they probably contained nasty thoughts about one another, when they meet, well, it's all different - albeit, they don't know really know who the other is. Upon their first meeting, Jimmy introduces Claire to Mary as his "cousin," though Claire and Jimmy purposely act very flirty with one another, and Mary becomes obviously irked. But not much later and the two women are friends, and that night they have a very personal, honest conversation between the two of them. It is here where Claire gives away that her husband is a publisher (she doesn't give a name), and admits his many infidelities and how she feels about them. Here is where the two women grow in immense respect for each other: a respect so great that about ten minutes later, when Rogers bursts in the room and the truth comes out, they still manage to uphold that decency for one another.

Which lady was I rooting for? Okay, it's pretty obvious and call me biased: but Claire, or Greer, all the way. Yes, Mary was the writer, which was one thing I did like about her. But to me Claire's personality was the more likable one. She was really charming, and fashionable, and pretty - you kind of wondered what was wrong with Rogers for cheating on her all the time! I was "impressed", so to say, by her knowledge of sailing. There's a scene where she takes Jimmy on a boating trip that's so hilarious, mostly because Claire knows possibly everything about the boat and Jimmy is a mess. ;)

So yes, I was Team Claire. Since I didn't really like the Rogers character at all ("You dirty cheating rat!"), I more or less wanted Claire to land up with Jimmy. [SPOILER: That obviously didn't happen, but I really would've liked it to, they would've made a cute couple, I think.] 

Then there was Mary. I liked her obviously because she was a novelist, but a lot of it ended there. [Yeah, I can see you guys shaking your heads because you think this obviously isn't a fair comparison, not for me.] I think what bothered me the most was her ignorance of Claire [before she met her and she was a figment of existence, probably a frump who would happen to be her lover's wife]. I think it made her look selfish that upon beginning her affair with Rogers, she was only constrained by a little bit of guilt. It almost disgusted me when she took Rogers out to her friend's farm in Connecticut [this would later become the location of her meeting with Claire] to carry out the affair in a safe environment, more or less to protect herself instead of avoiding hurting Claire.

Plus, her fashion sense was kind of weird. I liked Claire's elegant gowns a lot (and the color blocked day dress she's wearing in the GIF above), but I just wasn't going crazy over Mary's Star Wars-Jedi like dress. And when you threw in the glasses she kinda looked like Gandhi.

When this movie was made, Greer was known for her work in 1940's "Pride and Prejudice", but Joan Crawford was the bigger movie star - it would be another year until the release of "Random Harvest" and "Mrs. Miniver," and Greer's successes in these two vehicles would launch a career that would make her the biggest star of the World War Two era. So at the time, Joan was the more popular one, but reviews of the film today often present Greer as the better actress in this film, and I must agree. But as I said in my review of this movie, Greer and Joan's acting styles are completely different - Greer is refined, Joan is more obvious - and therefore it isn't fair to contrast the two.

I did my best to try and find what the off screen relationship was between the two of these actresses: did they like each other? or not really? Here's what I found:
Greer showing off her legs backstage.


  • "Joan was completely nonplussed that I refused to feud with her," said Greer. Apparently Joan grew more irked during filming when she perhaps realized how Greer's character was steeling the film, and it was not a "thankless" role as she had anticipated. About eight years later, Joan would seek revenge by embarrasing Greer at a dinner party. Joan seated Greer's then time beau (and later husband), Buddy Fogelson, at the main table with herself, and sent Greer to sit at the studio electricians table, "Because you get along with everybody, dear!"
  • Joan's camp on the other hand, claims, that Joan was simply surprised that Greer was being headlined in this film along such big stars as she and Robert Taylor. She couldn't understand what she was doing there - but then again, she thought Claire's role a "thankless" one.

Oh, well!

Whose side are you on? [Even if you haven't seen this movie.] This is an interesting rivalry, on screen (where at times it wasn't much of a rivalry at all), and off screen, it appears, too!

I had a lot of fun with this topic and I thank Lara at Backlots for coming up with such an interesting topic! Be sure and go over to her blog so you can check out all the other entries! Thank you for hosting this, Lara! 


 ***
By the way, despite the fact that I like Greer Garson a LOT (as we all know) and I was on her side in many ways in this post, I don't want you all to think I despise Joan or anything! And yes, I am Team Bette... but really. And to prove it to you, here's a candid GIF of Joan looking beautiful  with some gorgeous auburn hair: 


Oh, and I thought you all ought to know that while I was writing this post, Jeopardy was on TV and there was a Classic Cinema topic!!! One of the questions was about "Mrs. Miniver," and I nearly fell out of my chair before screaming at the screen the quite obvious answer! I got the daily double, too, after endlessly  insisting, "The African Queen! The African Queen!" 

THANKS AGAIN FOR THE FIFTY + FOLLOWERS, EVERYONE! :) I'll be back soon to write a post for the Humphrey Bogart Blogathon!

Sunday, December 18, 2011

Sunday Movie Review: "Miracle on 34th Street" (1947) ❅



I'm back again, with the third Sunday in my Four Sundays of Christmas blogathon! For each four Sundays of this month, I'm sharing with you my favorite Christmas films. So far, I've reviewed "Holiday Affair (1949)" and "Christmas in Connecticut (1945)".

As a note: Sally over at Flying Down to Hollywood is hosting the 12 Days of Christmas blogathon, and I secured a spot, promising to write up for this film. Therefore, this review is my contribution to the blogathon. Be sure and go over to her blog and check out the other 11 entries, I'm sure they'll all be lovely - I believe a full list of all twelve entries will be compiled on Christmas Eve, so you can see it then. As for now, this is my entry. Thank you, Sally, for hosting this!

Before I get onto the review, just a quick note, guys - you might have noticed that I only need one more follower to reach fifty. To reach fifty followers after a little more than six months of blogging would honestly just make me sooo happy! When I started this blog I wasn't even sure if I'd be able to manage a few followers, so to nearly reach this milestone truly blows me. :) The thing is, I haven't exactly reached it yet... I still need just another follower, and I've really like to reach fifty by the end of this year. There's just about thirteen days left in this year. Let's see if we can reach it!

Okay, enough of that. Time for the review! And, as promised, here is this Sunday's classic Christmas carol:

"Let it Snow" by one of my favorites, Doris Day

And this week's movie, as you might already be able to tell, is "Miracle on 34th Street," (1947) with Maureen O'Hara, Edmund Gwenn, and a very young Natalie Wood.

***
The poster: Alright, if a little dull! (In my humble opinion)

The plot:
When Santa falls down drunk in the Thanksgiving Day Parade, reluctant Macy's supervisor Doris Walker (Maureen O'Hara) offers the job to a bearded Kris Kringle (Edmund Gwenn, who won a Best Supporting Actor Oscar) purporting to be the real Santa! During the Christmas season, he shares a flat with Doris's neighbor (John Payne), who has eyes for Doris. Kris hopes to unite the two while winning over Doris's skeptical 6-year-old daughter (Natalie Wood). [from Netflix]

The starring players:
  • Edmund Gwenn as Kris Kringle
  • Maureen O'Hara as Doris Walker
  • Natalie Wood as Susan Walker
  • William Frawley as Charlie Halloran
The verdict:
4/5
You may call this movie a big advertisement for Macy's but I love it all the while. I love the plot, it's humorous and sweet, but don't label it as all fluff. It actually deals with some serious topics, not to mention that our Santa lands up in an mental institution on grounds of insanity. You also have Maureen O'Hara as a successful single mother - single due to divorce, something not quite popular in 1947. Thus Doris Walker became such a symbol for immorality in this Christmas film that it impelled the Legion of Decency to give this movie a B rating. So, no, despite it being based on a children's tale by Valentine Davies, it's not all fluff.. not exactly.

Edmund Gwenn is the perfect stereotypical Santa, with his glorious beard, rotund stomach, and jolly holiday spirit. He is so good, in fact, I think that he is the very definition of "Kris Kringle" in many people's minds, mine included. He is persuasive above all, which I think in this movie is very necessary. So he definitely deserved the Oscar he garnered for this role.

Maureen O'Hara is also fantastic as Doris Walker. In most cases you would resent the fact that she has forced her daughter, Susan, to grow up and face reality the way it is. But I can honestly say that her character is likable, and you can truly understand her reasons for not wanting Susan to believe in Santa Claus. She is wonderful across John Payne, her romance interest. He too is good, a very likable character, and all the while long you have your fingers crossed for he and Maureen O'Hara to get together.

Thus brings me to Natalie as Susan Walker. Natalie Wood never really considered herself a child movie star, not one in the likes of Shirley Temple or Margaret O'Brian - whereas the latter mentioned actresses had vehicles created for them in which they starred, Natalie usually played people's children in films. So she considered herself more of an actress in films who happened to be a child. Yet out of all the films of her childhood career, this is the most famous, and the one that probably marks her as a child movie star.

Bottom line is I loved her in this role. She is so sweet as the doubting six year old, and one of my favorite scenes in this movie is one in which she teaches Santa how to chew bubble gum. All the while her maturity prevents her from becoming sickeningly sweet or annoying, i.e Shirley Temple in her films. Also in this cast you've got William Frawley, in one of his pre-Fred Mertz roles.

I really love this movie. It's sentimental, charming, genuinely entertaining - albeit bordering on corny at times, but that's okay because it's a Christmas movie. I find it, even, a little clever. This film has found its way into many people's hearts - point in case, a colorized version (one we should all AVOID however). But I really suggest you settle into a comfy chair with a cup of hot chocolate and the B&W version of this movie. This one is one of my favorites to watch over and over!

Bottom line:
This will take you on an affectionate journey, and it's the type to leave you with a warm and fuzzy feeling. So I strongly suggest you watch it. :)

Some photos:




[via]

Some trivia:
  • Natalie, who was eight when she did this, was truly convinced during the filming that Edmund Gwenn was Santa Claus. It wasn't until she saw him at the wrap party out of costume that she realized he wasn't Santa.
  • Darryl F. Zanuck did not really promote this as a Christmas movie. He wanted the film to be released in May (and it was), because he claimed more people went to the movies in the summer. Therefore, the Christmas movie angle was not used so often when publicizing this movie.
  • Maureen O'Hara was pretty much forced into this role, as she was just returning to native Ireland when she got called back for this movie. But upon seeing the script and meeting the young Natalie Wood (she and Maureen would form a strong bond), she changed her sentiments.
A movie tidbit:


***
It's only a week until Christmas! Can you believe it???!

You'll probably be hearing a lot from me this upcoming week. I have two blogathons as well as some Christmas posts planned, and then the last Sunday in my blogathon. So.... until later! Here's a photo of Lucy, Cary Grant (!!!!) and Ann Sheridan to keep you in the holiday spirit:

Yes, I cried tears of joy when I saw this photo.


Saturday, December 17, 2011

5 Things I Loved: Madame Curie (1943)

So, because of my Four Sundays of Christmas blogathon, I haven't been able to do movie reviews for the movies I've been watching recently. One of these movies is "Madame Curie (1943)," with the Pidgeons (AKA, Greer and Walter) and I do want to talk about it. So I thought instead of doing a movie review like I usually do, I would take a little spin on "5 Things I Love," the segment I usually use for someone's birthday, and switch it around for a film. Therefore, I present to you five things I loved about "Madame Curie."

Over all, I give "Madame Curie," 4 out of 5 stars. Not an excellent film but I really did enjoy it all the while, and there were certainly points about it that I really loved, which I'll now point out to you!

Return to Main Page for Madame Curie Posters

5 Things I Loved: Madame Curie (1943)

Raising the biopic to new heights, director Mervyn LeRoy's Oscar-nominated drama stars Greer Garson and Walter Pidgeon as the titular scientist and her French physicist husband. After young Polish student Marie and Dr. Pierre Curie fall in love and marry, the pair sets to work isolating a new element, radium. After years of painstaking research, their efforts pay off, but just as success comes calling, so does tragedy. [from Netflix]

#5: It made science come alive.
I'm really more of a English and history person than I am of a math/science person. I actually do make As in the two latter mentioned subjects, only they don't hold my attention or interest me as much as learning about the past or writing! However, this movie really made Madame Curie's story interesting to me. Now I'm really so impressed by what she did (and best of all - I understood how she did it!). And also, to do all she did in the early 20th century, which was a time where people expected women to sit back on their heels and let the men do everything - well, impressive is an understatement! For once, science was thrilling, and though a lot of it had to do with the fact it was Greer and Walter discovering radium, well, it was still exciting for once!


#4: "To catch a star..."
There's one line often used when Marie Curie's story is told, and that is this lovely lovely line: "To catch a star on your fingertips." Well, for the romanticizing writer that I am, that's one line that really sets me dreaming. Doesn't it? And add to that line Greer's expression, the dreaminess flitting across her pretty face, and all of that, and you can nearly feel the stardust on your fingertips. 

[via]

#3: The way nerdy scientists fall in love, and propose.
The one adorable scene in this movie is when Walter's character, Pierre Curie, decides all of a sudden to come out with and propose to Marie. It's the middle of the night and they're staying at his parents house in the French countryside, and he stomps up to her bedroom and bangs on the door, "Madame Skłodowska!" (her name before she was married). Then he goes in there, and she's sitting in the bed all confuzzled, and then in the most brilliant vocabulary, drawing comparisons to themselves and scientific compounds, he explains why the should get married (for it will be best for the world of science.). And then in the same, well, nerdy way Greer agrees - and happily Walter agrees to this, leaves the room, and then comes back, realizing he's forgotten something. He then plants a kiss on Greer's forehead. Here, watch for yourself (starts at 40 minutes and 55 seconds):


#2: The supporting cast.
This movie has a fantastic, fantastic support casting! Henry Travers, one of my favorite character actors and Clarence from "It's a Wonderful Life," plays Walter's father. Van Johnson, who was not yet a star (just three years earlier he'd played in his first movie role, a chorus boy in "Too Many Girls," the 1940 movie in which Lucy and Desi fell in love on the set of ;D), makes a really short appearance as a reporter (you can watch it here). And then there's Margaret O'Brian as their daughter. She's so adorable, really! And you know, Margaret was such a big star in her own right in the early 40's. I loved her in "Meet Me in St. Louis" - I think I like her much better than Shirley Temple. Here she is with Greer and Walter in a very sweet scene (the Curies have once more hit a glitch in their quest to discover radium): 


#1: It made me CRY.
Okay, so this is honestly a SPOILER, unless you know Marie Curie's life story, in which you might already know this was coming. Anyway, SPOILER. Now, let's get on with it - so after they discovered radium, the Pidgeons and the adorable Margaret O'Brian (and their new baby) go on a holiday for some much needed rest (they'd been working in a shed for five years, being exposed to radium constantly), and Greer and Walter have this short conversation about what would happen if one of them had to go on without the other. After this, and the movie continues, I just honestly knew in my heart that Walter was going to die. Thus comes a scene where Greer's getting all dressed up and looking gorgeous for a party, and Walter decides to go out and get her some earrings, and on his way back - he's walking in the street - and I just knew it was coming, I'd been saying it for ten minutes that he was going to die - well, he gets run over by a wagon and dies instantly. Then Greer discovers the news and has the most painful expression on her face and I just started crying! I think it's the first time I've cried over a human dying in a movie. There comes a certain part where Greer just clutches the earrings he'd bought for her before dying, and crumples to the floor sobbing, and I just cried harder and harder. So yes, it made me cry, that's simply how amazing Greer and Walter are.

Greer looking lovely, and Walter right before he sets out to purchase the earrings. You just know it's going to happen! :/

***
Well, there it is, five things I loved about "Madame Curie (1943)". And like I said, overall I really enjoyed this movie and I suggest you watch it. The full movie is on Youtube, and the link for it is up in #3.

Christmas vacation and the holidays are almost here! I can hardly wait! :)

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Holiday Gift Guide for Classic Film Lovers

So, I've been seeing holiday gift guides for classic film lovers popping up at all of my favorite blogs recently, and so I thought I'd join in on the fun! Here are ten items sure to please most any classic film lover. Books and movies particularly. I've picked items that have come out this year, and have tried to vary it with gifts for both sexes. Like I said, there have been several guides already written so I've done my best to be original! And speaking of other guides, the most original by far however must be Clara's: go and read it. Best list of presents I've ever seen. ;)

Holiday Gift Guide for Classic Film Lovers

You can click on the link to be taken to where you can purchase it online. :)

MOVIE:

Cary Grant: The Early Years DVD Set

I really love the idea of this box set, I honestly think it's so clever! It contains Cary Grant's early films, before he became the suave, debonair movie star we all know. This box set contains three, rare movies from 1935: "Devil and the Deep," "The Eagle and the Hawk," and "The Last Outpost." His co-stars in these movies include Gary Cooper, Charles Laughton, and Tallulah Bankhead. This also has some great special features which include lobbycards, publicity stills, etc. PLUS, to top it off, it's on sale for 14% off at TCM (check the link up there). It's one of their best sellers, and this would make a great gift for any Cary Grant fan. Someday I honestly hope this set is mine. 

BOOK:


This is about a 350 book detailing Judy's legendary film career, written by John Fricke. Amazon has got it for good price currently. I myself haven't read this book - I don't think I've ever mentioned this, but I like Judy better as a singer than an actress. In fact, she's one of my favorite singers. I like her and I think any Judy fan will really enjoy this. It's gotten excellent reviews and TCM made it the book of the month in their magazine back in August, when it was first released. [Also, what a lovely cover it has! I think that's a sign of excellent pictures.]

BOOK:

Picture Show: Classic Movie Posters from the TCM Archives (Paperback)

This is kind of pricey, but I've still been eyeing this! It's filled with eye candy, 150 posters compiled from TCM's archives. If you read my Sunday Movie Reviews, you know that I enjoy movie posters and critiquing them. Posters from the Golden Era are often so nicely and neatly done they nearly seem like pieces of art themselves: paintings of movie stars, like the one on the cover of this book, are my personal favorite. This book has posters from seven decades of films, and from such studios as RKO, MGM, and Warner Brothers!


MOVIE:

Jean Arthur Comedy Collection DVD

This is pretty exciting for us Jean Arthur fans: Jean's first box set! I'm happy she's finally getting one, and it just so happens I haven't seen any of the movies this box set contains. The movies are as follows: "Adventure in Manhattan (1936)", "More than a Secretary (1936)", "The Impatient Years (1944)," and "The Public Menace  (1935)". A four disc set filled with Jean to get you laughing - pretty tempting, isn't it?

  MOVIE:

Greatest Gangster Films Collection: Prohibition Era DVD

I don't think I've mentioned this before, but I really love the Roaring Twenties. I simply adore this era of speakeasies, flappers, gangsters, jazz music, and F Scott Fitzgerald. I once even had a roaring twenties themed birthday party. BUT, anyway, back to the box set - that's why this drew my eye. I haven't seen that many gangster movies, but this looks like a great set of movies all set in the Roaring Twenties. It includes "Little Caesar (1930)", "Smart Money (1931)", "The Roaring Twenties (1939)," and "The Public Enemy (1931)". Actors in these films include James Cagney, Edward G. Robinson, and Humphrey Bogart. Sounds exciting, doesn't it??!!

BOOK:

Among the many anniversaries this year was Breakfast at Tiffany's fiftieth birthday! This book, written by Sarah Gristwood, is big and gorgeously illustrated, and it's that lovely shade of blue! I remember seeing it on a display at the bookstore, and I didn't buy it because it was slightly pricey, but it's really a lovely book. I also recommend this book about the making of the movie. I read it earlier this year and it's beautifully written, engrossing, and perfect for anyone who is a fan of the movie.

MOVIE:

Astaire And Rogers: 10-Film Collection DVD

This is definitely pricey at nearly sixty dollars, but it contains all ten films that Ginger and Fred did together in a gorgeous format (I adore that cover). I think this is the perfect gift for any hardcore Ginger and Fred lover, and honestly, who doesn't love the both of them together? This has got everything from "Flying Down to Rio" to "The Berkleys of Broadway." [This is a much cheaper option, however it's only got four of the ten movies. Still a nice package.]

MOVIE:

This is another sparkling set, containing all NINE of Kate and Spence's films. Gee, this one I'm totally also craving. I mean, all NINE movies that's pretty awesome you know! Like with the last one, there are other cheaper options but they don't contain all nine movies and I absolutely love the cover of this set. Also, for Tracy and Hepburn fans: you might want to check this book out, too, a very very very thorough biography of Spence (more than one thousand pages, to be exact. Thorough you think?)

BOOK:


This book, compiled by TCM and containing 4,000 questions, has been pretty popular this year! It looks really fun and I'm sure is filled with so much trivia. This is another one I have been contemplating to get - I read TCM's "Leading Ladies" book this year, and it was really nicely put together with beautiful pictures and a lovely format. TCM's books don't disappoint, so I have a feeling that this one will be good.

***

Well, there's my list of ten items!! Which ones have you got your eyes on?

By the way, TCM came out with their memorial video for the stars who died this year. This was another rough year - we lost Peter Falk, Cliff Robertson, Jane Russell... but for me the hardest would have to be Elizabeth Taylor.

It's lovely, I think, though I nearly thought they had somehow forgotten Elizabeth Taylor! They had me worried for a little bit... lol.


Sunday, December 11, 2011

Sunday Movie Review: "Holiday Affair" (1949) ❅



Hi everyone! Today's SMR is the next Sunday in my Four Sundays of Christmas. I explained this last week, but for those of you who don't know, my Four Sundays of Christmas are really four reviews [on each Sunday of this month] of my favorite classic Christmas films. The first Sunday was Christmas in Connecticut (1945) .  Before I get started with today's review, here's the Christmas carol [I'm also adding in my favorite classic Christmas songs with each movie review]:

Silent Night by Deanna Durbin, who celebrated her 90th birthday last week. This is from the movie Lady on a Train (1945)

This week's movie is the underrated Christmas classic, "Holiday Affair," (1949) with Janet Leigh, Robert Mitchum, and Wendell Corey.

***

The poster: I do like it, I love the idea of Janet Leigh wrapped up in some sort of a cellophane or foil (like a Christmas present), and Robert Mitchum's, "Baby, you're just what I want for Christmas!". Plus, Janet Leigh's son, in the corner, with his presents is simply adorable (as he is in the actual film).

The plot:
Janet Leigh stars as Connie Ennis, a young widowed mother who has an unfortunate first encounter with department store clerk Steve Mason (Robert Mitchum), inadvertently causing him to get fired just before Christmas. Despite the mishap, Steve takes Connie on a date, much to the chagrin of her better-established suitor, Carl, but much to the delight of her young son, Timmy, who would much prefer Steve to Carl as a stepdad. [from Netflix]

The starring players:
  • Janet Leigh as Connie Ennis
  • Robert Mitchum as Steve Mason
  • Wendell Corey as Carl Davis
The verdict:
4/5
This movie, as I said earlier, is really an underrated Christmas classic! I saw it for the first time last year on Christmas day, however I'd seen it being shown on TCM several times before around Christmastime, except had never taken the time to actually sit down and watch it. Last year I did, not really knowing what it was about, but when I began to watch it, I went, "OH! That movie!" with great realization and pleasure. [Yeah, I'm weird like that.]

Anyway, the plot is quite interesting and reminds me a tad of "Miracle on 34th Street", with the single mother and an adorable child, but the similarities do kind of end there. The plot is appropriately a tad mushy and not exactly original, but that's perfect for a Christmas film. I was watching a TCM special earlier this week about Christmas movies, and I think they made a very good point when they said that there's something about mushy Christmas stuff that makes you feel safe and warm. Anyhow, onto the acting -

Janet Leigh. She's one of the actresses I don't think I've talked about on this blog before, which is a shame because I really like her. I loved her performance in this, she's compelling and tugs on your heartstrings and all of that. You want things to go right for her. One of my favorite things between this is the relationship between Janet as the mom and the child actor who plays her son. THEY'RE SO ADORABLE! [Like think, Greer in "Blossoms in the Dust".] Like, I swear. So sweet. Except, it wasn't exactly sickening sweet, honestly it was just the right balance of everything you like to see in a good parent/adorable little child relationship.Anyway, bottom line is that Janet Leigh was really fabulous in this.

Then there's Robert Mitchum. According to the TCM special I watched, this was the first movie he made when he after being released from jail [he was arrested on account of marijuana possession], and the studio wanted to build up his image again as a "nice guy." Well, that's exactly what he is in this, and he's very good at it. He has pretty good chemistry with Janet Leigh. I still haven't exactly decided how I feel about Robert Mitchum, I like him in some things and not in others - but I definitely liked him in this.

Wendell Corey plays Janet Leigh's fiance. The only other thing I have seen him in is "No Sad Songs for Me," (1950), which I did a spoiler review for earlier this year. His character is as stiff as a bored, but don't let that turn you off to his performance, for he is quite first rate. Lastly, there's Gordon Gebert, a child actor, as Connie's son, Timmy. Let me just say it: THIS KID IS ADORABLE. And not even in annoying, sickening way. He's just so cute. GAHH! Him and Janet Leigh are like lovely in this, seriously, watch it for just the two of them together if nothing else.

So, like I said. Don't let the fact that you might not have heard about this movie stop you from watching it, it's really a Christmas charmer and it entraps you from end to start. The plot does lack originality but it makes up for it in viewing pleasure, and over all I'd really encourage you to watch this one: I really liked it.

The bottom line:
You should really watch it. Because the little boy and Janet Leigh are really cute. No, really - it's sweet and old fashioned, just the way I like it. 

Some photos:




Some trivia:
  • Lux Radio Theatre broadcast a radio adaption of this film in December 1950 with Robert Mitchum reprising his film role.
A movie tidbit:
Once again, I honestly would just like to post the whole movie as it's available. -;)

***
That's all for this Sunday. I know that review was kind of spazzier than usual [spazzier - that's honestly not even a word, right...] but I hoped my point came across anyway: it's a really good movie. 

Have a good start into Monday with plenty of holiday cheer!